















Hunter
College
The Challenge
As a college of the City University of New York (CUNY), the systems and information that Hunter students need are split between CUNY and Hunter websites. This disjointed experience is confusing, frustrating, and often leads to missed opportunities.

To make matters worse, Hunter’s website was built 10 years ago on an unfriendly CMS. Instead of using it, many of Hunter’s departments created their own websites, but they’ve struggled to keep information consistent and accurate over time.
To rein in their departments, Hunter asked VGD to help consolidate the information that undergraduate students need for academic and financial planning. That included building responsive templates with a new CMS, which would be leveraged to update their entire website later on.
As the UX/Product Architect, I directed our process from research through design. I was also responsible for collaborating with stakeholders, communicating all findings and solutions, while addressing their questions.
I conducted most of the user and stakeholder research and developed the information architecture, wireframes, and early prototypes for the site. Later on, I directed developers to build additional prototypes and designers to create high fidelity designs.
Research & Validation
After being briefed on the project, Hunter staff walked me through the sites and systems students have to use. They also shared their Google Analytics account and a report on Hunter students conducted by an independent researcher before I was brought on.
Hunter had a general idea of what they wanted; a section of the website consolidating the information students need to succeed. It would appear as “Students” in a menu for accessing information by audience. That menu would be secondary to the main navigation, which organized information by topic.
I used Adobe Muse to create a rough prototype of their concept and went to campus to test with students. I also conducted usability tests of the current site and interviewed students on their most recent experiences.


I learned that students struggled to navigate and find answers on Hunter’s site. They primarily relied on Google search, but also asked for direction from friends and family who were upperclassmen.
The most critical discovery was that students expected to find all content through the main navigation, which organized information by topic. They did not try to use the menu that consolidated information for “Students.”
While it may be a useful tool once students learn about it, it was clear that a “Students” section did not fit their mental model of the site. There would always be confusion about which information can be found through the main navigation or in the “Students” section.
I proposed redoing the entire website’s architecture and organizing all information by topics, instead of having a secondary audience-based section. The project’s stakeholders agreed that that would be ideal. Unfortunately, since they had received a grant to create a tool just for students, they would be audited before we could overhaul the entire website.
They decided to proceed with the original plan, with the understanding that some students may overlook the new section. Content within the topic based structure of the site would have to be redundant or direct students to the “Students” section.
Information Architecture
I first tried to develop the IA for this section of the site by reviewing Hunter’s existing sites, Google Analytics, and Google Trends. But much of their content was unclear, missing, inconsistent, or inaccurate.
Instead, I devised a plan to develop the IA by identifying, prioritizing, and organizing the needs of students.















I ran five workshops with students and staff using individual idea generation, affinity mapping, and dot voting. I logged the results as mind maps in MindNode and combined them into one organized map of student needs.

To verify the results, I conducted open card sorting exercises with students. I then refined the mind map into a site map and returned to Hunter to test an updated prototype.
Usability Testing
I drew wireframes for our UI designers and worked closely with them to design several templates for the site. At the same time, I asked a developer to build a new prototype.
I conducted several rounds of testing on-campus and the results were overwhelmingly positive. The site map and UI evolved with each round of testing and feedback from Hunter.




Content Design
I worked closely with Hunter’s staff to update their content for the new IA. In the process, I taught them how to design content for the web. I edited several sections of the site as examples and gave them feedback on their drafts.
Considering the state of their existing site, this was quite an undertaking. Hunter was still editing their content when I left VGD.
Content Navigation
I reorganized their content into four distinct categories.

Redesigned Nav Bar
Hunter’s global nav was redesigned in anticipation of a full site overhaul.
Dynamic Navigation
Shows siblings and children of the current page or topic and collapses parents.

Topic List Components
Complex topics can be broken into digestible pages or linear steps.